Actually let’s explore this a bit more by looking at the specific imagery of the Tarot of the Renaissance.
This Five of Wands is similar to that in the Rider-Waite-Smith deck, though instead of many figures fighting with sticks, we see one figure backed into a corner readying himself to fight off unseen attackers. This card indicates a competitive feeling, directed towards the “little things,” rather than fighting over major issues. Petty disagreements in order to establish turf is the phrase that comes to mind. This is not to say that for some people the various issues surrounding the debate on funding aspects of the budget are not serious business, but it indicates that others are exploiting the disagreements and fostering discord in order to gain power, not with a view to solving the issue
The image of Two of Swords in the Tarot of the Renaissance amplifies this interpretation. Two men smile as they hold aloft their swords. The men are wearing different styles of clothing, possibly indicating that they are not on the same side; yet they are not hostile toward one another. In fact, they seem to be enjoying themselves. Perhaps it is only a game to them. Power, in this schema, resides in being in control of money, and the way to gain control is in the cynical manipulation of emotions, rather than rational debate.
From the first half of the spread, we would predict that we are in store for a lot of emotional language and posturing, especially from politicians seeking their party’s presidential nomination. The Two of Swords could indicate that members of both parties will likely indulge in emotional rather than rational debate of the issues, hoping to secure some extra support and love from their constituents. However, in the end, it is just posturing and the issues could be resolved satisfactorily.
So far, the message in the cards seems to reinforce the main thesis of the Phillips article, that ideological agendas are the underlying reason of why a shutdown might occur.